@reece.medway Reece, good question. For a development agency side subscription model, could be very perspective as monthly / annually recurring revenue with a long tail.
Such subscription REV could be based on consumed by bot resources (API calls, cloud instances, upgrades etc.). this is pretty simple and transparent basic model perspective for SMB clients, so they have a bot and don’t need to care about any tech issues.
@cameronjjenkinson Cameron, this’s also a good point about an expertise. there’s something good that can built on expertise and consumed resources subscription model
if your chatbot delivers
-
a very special experience with no strong alternatives on a market
-
you’re on the TOP of a great customer acquisition channel eg, local market, your current business clients base etc.
or you have other strong points for multiplying your customer base easily selling customised ‘template’ of a chatbot, you can benefit as a development agency from this A LOT charging extra for business values over just consumed resources.
this is the win-to-win business model for customers too — they receive a chatbot based on a template framework owned by an agency that consistently works on polishing it, adding new features and possibly able to deliver custom features that can be purchased as add-ons.
there’s an article about How should we price our chatbot development services? written by Alex Gamanyuk. There’re some numbers and examples based on botmaker companies that are partnering with us.
If you want to validate your chatbot ‘template’ perspective against different price models feel free to drop me a line about it at andrei@botmakers.net